A meta-review of disaster research

Hassam Bin Waseem () and Irfan Ahmad Rana ()
Additional contact information
Hassam Bin Waseem: National University of Sciences & Technology
Irfan Ahmad Rana: National University of Sciences & Technology

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 11, No 2, 12427-12460

Abstract: Abstract Review articles are vital in synthesizing existing research, identifying knowledge gaps, and informing future research directions. In the context of disasters, reviews help uncover relationships, intricacies, and nexus among different hazard types, concepts, and thematic areas. However, existing reviews tend to adopt a segmented approach, focusing on individual disasters, with limited efforts toward comprehensive meta-reviews across multiple disaster types. This study conducted a meta-review, or review of reviews, on six major disasters: droughts, earthquakes, floods, heatwaves, hurricanes, and wildfires. A total of 26,076 review articles were retrieved from the Scopus database. Bibliometric analysis, review trend analysis, keyword mapping, and citation analysis were performed to explore the landscape of disaster-related review literature. The analysis revealed a consistent increase in published review articles, particularly on floods, droughts, and earthquakes. A total of 962 authors from 160 distinct Institutions globally contributed to the disaster reviews domain. Reviews on droughts, heatwaves, and wildfires received the highest citation counts. Most reviews were published in English and Chinese. Keyword analysis highlighted resilience and adaptation as recurrent terms across all disaster types, underscoring their central role in disaster risk reduction and vulnerability mitigation. The findings indicate a growing global interest in synthesizing disaster research through reviews, especially for specific hazards. However, the limited number of integrated meta-reviews indicates the need for more holistic approaches. The observed interconnections among different disasters suggest that a collective, cross-hazard perspective is crucial to understanding complex disaster dynamics and enhancing resilience, adaptation, and sustainability strategies.

Keywords: Disaster; Review of review; Drought; Earthquake; Flood; Heatwave; Hurricane; Wildfire (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07296-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07296-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07296-y

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().