Validation and comparison of event-based sediment yield estimations using MUSLE and RUSLE/SDR models: the case of çarşamba suyu sub-basin, southwest central Anatolia, Türkiye

Abdul Alim Mohammadi, Resat Akgoz, Selen Deviren Saygin () and Gunay Erpul
Additional contact information
Abdul Alim Mohammadi: Ankara University
Resat Akgoz: Ankara University
Selen Deviren Saygin: Ankara University
Gunay Erpul: Ankara University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 11, No 46, 13542 pages

Abstract: Abstract Accurate sediment yield estimation is essential for watershed management, yet modeling uncertainties persist, particularly in the absence of continuous event-based observations. This study evaluates event-scale sediment yield predictions for 62 storm events over four years using RUSLE/SDR and MUSLE within a GIS-based framework for the Çarşamba Suyu Sub-Basin, Türkiye. Model parameters were derived from rainfall erosivity, soil data, topographic features, and satellite imagery. Calibration incorporated energy-based erosivity metrics rainfall kinetic energy (R-factor) and runoff energy (Q.qp) to enhance predictive performance. Although official records have shifted from event-based to monthly discharge monitoring in recent years, available observations allowed model calibration and partial validation. Both MUSLE and RUSLE showed strong internal consistency (R2 = 0.95), and significant correlations with observed data (MUSLE: R2 = 0.70, RUSLE/SDR: R2 = 0.56). Overestimation was noted in 2017 (MUSLE: 1.189 t ha⁻1 yr⁻1, RUSLE/SDR: 1.419 t ha⁻1 yr⁻1, observed: 0.328 t ha⁻1 yr⁻1), while MUSLE closely aligned with observations in 2018 (0.952 vs. 0.991 t ha⁻1 yr⁻1). By 2019, both models converged on observed values (MUSLE: 0.259, RUSLE/SDR: 0.288, observed: 0.238 t ha⁻1 yr⁻1). Integration of the Composite Weighted Connectivity Index (CWCI) and seasonal adjustment of the soil erodibility factor (K) further improved accuracy. The findings highlight RUSLE's suitability for long-term trend analysis, while MUSLE provides event-specific resolution. A hybrid framework combining both models alongside connectivity-based calibration and regression between R and Q·qp is recommended to improve sediment yield prediction, especially in data-limited basins.

Keywords: Erosion modeling; Connectivity Index; Runoff erosivity factor; Remote sensing; GIS; Calibration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07328-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07328-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07328-7

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().