Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds

Bruno Merz () and Annegret Thieken ()

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2009, vol. 51, issue 3, 437-458

Abstract: Although flood risk assessments are frequently associated with significant uncertainty, formal uncertainty analyses are the exception rather than the rule. We propose to separate two fundamentally different types of uncertainty in flood risk analyses: aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. Aleatory uncertainty refers to quantities that are inherently variable in time, space or populations of individuals or objects. Epistemic uncertainty results from incomplete knowledge and is related to our inability to understand, measure and describe the system under investigation. The separation between aleatory and epistemic uncertainty is exemplified for the flood risk analysis of the city of Cologne, Germany. This flood risk assessment consists of three modules: (1) flood frequency analysis, (2) inundation estimation and (3) damage estimation. By the concept of parallel models, the epistemic uncertainty of each module is quantified. The epistemic uncertainty associated with the risk estimate is reduced by introducing additional information into the risk analysis. Finally, the contribution of different modules to the total uncertainty is quantified. The flood risk analysis results in a flood risk curve, representing aleatory uncertainty, and in associated uncertainty bounds, representing epistemic uncertainty. In this way, the separation reveals the uncertainty (epistemic) that can be reduced by more knowledge and the uncertainty (aleatory) that is not reducible. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Keywords: Floods; Uncertainty; Flood frequency analysis; Damage estimation; Risk analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-009-9452-6 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:51:y:2009:i:3:p:437-458

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-009-9452-6

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().