Assessment of drought hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and risk for rice cultivation in the Mun River Basin in Thailand

Saowanit Prabnakorn (), Shreedhar Maskey, F. X. Suryadi and Charlotte Fraiture
Additional contact information
Saowanit Prabnakorn: IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
Shreedhar Maskey: IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
F. X. Suryadi: IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
Charlotte Fraiture: IHE Delft Institute for Water Education

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2019, vol. 97, issue 2, No 21, 911 pages

Abstract: Abstract When assessing drought risk, most studies focus on hazard and vulnerability, paying less attention to exposure. Here, we propose a comprehensive drought risk assessment scheme combining hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. At the Mun River Basin, 90% of rice cultivation is rain-fed and regularly encounters droughts resulting in the lowest yields in the country. The water deficit calculated with respect to rice water requirement is used to assess drought hazard and is estimated at monthly time steps. We use drought severity and frequency for hazard estimation and population and rice field characteristics for exposure. Vulnerability is represented by physical and socioeconomic factors and coping and adaptive capacity. Between 1984 and 2016, monthly precipitation during the rice-growing season was insufficient to meet rice water needs at all growth stages (July–November). The hazard is more severe in October and November, which can lead to significantly reduced yields. People and rice fields in the center part of the basin are more exposed to drought than in other parts. Extensive areas are under high and moderate vulnerability due to low coping capacity. The higher drought risks appear in the last 2 months of the growing season and decrease from north to south, while the risk map of total precipitation demonstrates that most of the areas have low and very low risk. This emphasizes the importance of monthly time series analysis to calculate agricultural drought hazard and risk. Consequently, we recommend using the hazard and risk maps for October and November instead of the total precipitation to develop solutions to improve rice yield.

Keywords: Precipitation; Monthly time series analysis; Risk assessment scheme; Water deficit; Agricultural drought (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03681-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:97:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03681-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03681-6

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().