Strainburst characteristics under bolt support conditions: an experimental study

Xiaochuan Hu, Guoshao Su (), Kang Chen, Tianbin Li and Quan Jiang
Additional contact information
Xiaochuan Hu: Guangxi University
Guoshao Su: Guangxi University
Kang Chen: Guangxi University
Tianbin Li: State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection
Quan Jiang: Chinese Academy of Sciences

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2019, vol. 97, issue 2, No 22, 913-933

Abstract: Abstract Strainburst, defined as a burst that occurs on the periphery of tunnels, is always associated with intact and hard brittle rocks and high geo-stress. In practical engineering, the prevention of strainburst by bolting does not achieve the desired effects. Deep insight into the strainburst process and mechanisms under bolt support conditions is necessary to ensure safe underground construction. In this study, strainburst characteristics under bolt support conditions were investigated using a true-triaxial rockburst testing system, which was equipped with an acoustic emission monitoring system. High-speed cameras were also used to capture the ejection failure process. Two indicators, namely kinetic energy and maximum decibel, were used to comprehensively evaluate the rockburst intensity. In addition, characteristic stresses, failure mode and cracking mechanisms under different bolt spacing conditions were investigated. The test results demonstrated that rockburst is greatly affected by the bolt arrangement. Rockburst changes from the way occurring in the form of a local failure in weak area to the way striking the bolt position and even the overall free face with the decrease in bolt spacing. The use of the bolt increases the rockburst intensity, but the intensity decreases as the bolt spacing decreases. Characteristic stresses including crack initiation stress, crack damage stress and peak strength increase monotonously with the use of bolt and the decreasing bolt spacing. During the strainburst, tensile failure dominates the cracking process regardless of bolt spacing; however, with the use of bolt and decrease in bolt spacing, tensile splitting near the free face become less obvious and the proportion of shear failure gradually increased.

Keywords: Rockburst; Strainburst; Bolt support; True-triaxial tests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03682-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:97:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03682-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03682-5

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().