A hybrid decision-making conceptual framework based on generalized information quality under neutrosophic evidence theory: a comparative analysis

Antonios Paraskevas () and Michael Madas ()
Additional contact information
Antonios Paraskevas: University of Macedonia
Michael Madas: University of Macedonia

Operational Research, 2025, vol. 25, issue 1, No 19, 23 pages

Abstract: Abstract Simulating uncertainty for dealing with actual events is one of Artificial Intelligence's key difficulties and challenges. The ultimate objective for decision-makers is to manage uncertainty, particularly in indeterminate scenarios when it is not the case that the solution of the problem can be expressed with true or false values. As a result, new techniques to facilitate the interpretation of indeterminacy are currently under development. Neutrosophic logic (NL), which addresses the concept of neutralities, extends classic logic, fuzzy logic, paraconsistent logic, intuitionistic logic, and so on. The single-valued neutrosophic set (SVN) is a subclass of neutrosophic sets that has recently been presented. Solving multicriteria decision-making problems is an essential use case for SVNs to be applied. The research objectives of the article are twofold. First, we examine the potential of utilizing single-valued neutrophilic sets in a more efficient manner to address the issue of multicriteria decision-making. Within this framework, our aim is to explore and extend the concept of information quality as an uncertainty measure by comparing it to neutrosophic Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory in the context of decision-making. As a proposed solution to the aforementioned research objectives, this manuscript suggests and implements a novel conceptual framework for determining and quantifying the similarity measure between SVNSs in a multicriteria decision-making context under the principles of D–S evidence theory. Finally, illustrative case studies are given to support the logic and practicality of the suggested methodology compared to current methodologies.

Keywords: MCDM methods; Single-valued neutrosophic set; Basic probability assignment (BPA); Correlation coefficient; Dempster–Shafer evidence theory; Similarity measures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-024-00897-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00897-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... search/journal/12351

DOI: 10.1007/s12351-024-00897-8

Access Statistics for this article

Operational Research is currently edited by Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis, John Psarras and Constantin Zopounidis

More articles in Operational Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().