EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A decision support tool for oil spill response strategy selection: application of LBWA and Z MABAC methods

Darko Božanić (), Dragan Pamucar (), Ibrahim Badi () and Duško Tešić ()
Additional contact information
Darko Božanić: University of Defense in Belgrade
Dragan Pamucar: University of Belgrade
Ibrahim Badi: Libyan Academy
Duško Tešić: University of Defense in Belgrade

OPSEARCH, 2023, vol. 60, issue 1, No 2, 24-58

Abstract: Abstract The high global demand for oil and its derivatives has increased the risk of oil spills associated with the extraction, processing, and transportation of this product. Oil spill emergency management considers that decision-making is a very complex and multi-criteria problem that must be taken into account, given that the effects of these spills include several aspects, the most important of which are the environmental and economic impacts. Oil spill response management decisions are aimed at minimizing these impacts. To solve such a complex problem, this paper is devoted to propose a new multi-criteria model using LBWA-Z MABAC methods. In the first step, the model uses the LBWA method to calculate the criteria weights coefficients. In the second step, the modified MABAC method with Z-numbers was used to select the best contingency strategy to deal with oil spill risks. The calculations were performed on the El Sharara field, which is the second largest oil producing field in Libya. In the case study, six criteria and nine strategies were used, which were selected by a group of experts. The results showed that the type and volume of the oil spill is the most important criterion for selecting the appropriate strategy, and that the best strategy for managing the oil spill in the case study is drain blocking. In order to check the model, a sensitivity analysis was performed by analyzing the effect of changes in the values of the weighting coefficients on the ranking results, as well as by studying the effect of changing the p, q factors. The results obtained were also compared with the fuzzy method and the Z numbers.

Keywords: Z number; Level based weight assessment (LBWA); Multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC); Fuzzy logic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-022-00605-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:opsear:v:60:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-022-00605-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... search/journal/12597

DOI: 10.1007/s12597-022-00605-0

Access Statistics for this article

OPSEARCH is currently edited by Birendra Mandal

More articles in OPSEARCH from Springer, Operational Research Society of India
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:60:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-022-00605-0