The Peculiar Case of the Mushroom Picking Robot: Extra-contractual Liability in Robotics

Ioannis Revolidis () and Alan Dahi
Additional contact information
Ioannis Revolidis: Institute for Legal Informatics, Leibniz Universität Hannover

A chapter in Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, 2018, pp 57-79 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter focuses on the extra-contractual liabilityExtra-contractual liability of robotsRobot(s) . It shows that robot-specific difficulties facing the legal system can be found in other areas of the lawLaw , and that the lawLaw has successfully addressed the difficulties. As such, a specific “(LiabilityLiability ) LawLaw of the Robot” is not needed. Moreover, robots are too diverse a category to permit a uniform approach of dealing with the liabilityLiability of their acts. RobotsRobot(s) , and the underlying Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence (AI) , will need to be assessed against their purposes and capabilities, respectively. The contribution does not intend to offer a detailed answer on how exactly the problem of extra-contractual liabilityExtra-contractual liability of robots shall be addressed, considering that such a discussion goes beyond a book chapter. It represents a first effort to explore the methodological particularities of the problem. It will, therefore, only include detailed insights to the extent necessary for the relevant methodological discussion. Without any intention of oversimplifying the problem of the civil accountability of robotsRobot(s) , as the detailed nuances of the probable solutions definitely need further refinement, the chapter assumes that the traditional risk distribution mechanisms of civil liabilityCivil liability systems can provide for a solid framework that can be processed further in order to adequately meet the particularities of robotsRobot(s) . Drawing from the “LawLaw of the Horse” debate, the chapter neither pleads for technological insensitivity nor does it proclaim that technological utopianism shall be the method to replace it, but it suggests that the lessons from regulating the Internet might point to a creative synthesis of technological advancements and traditional regulatory mechanisms, so that both are represented equally in the new set of rules that is meant to regulate new and disruptive phenomena, such as the social and economic impact of robotsRobot(s) .

Keywords: Robots; Civil liability; Torts; Agency; Legal personhood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:perchp:978-981-13-2874-9_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789811328749

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2874-9_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().