Style Matters: Intellectual Property Rights and the New Creative Economy

Perttu Isohanni () and Petra Hietanen-Kunwald ()
Additional contact information
Perttu Isohanni: Aalto University, School of Business, Department of Accounting and Business Law
Petra Hietanen-Kunwald: Aalto University, School of Business, Department of Accounting and Business Law

A chapter in Generative AI, Contracts, Law and Design, 2025, pp 171-192 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligenceIntelligence (GenAI) poses an existential threat to the creative profession. It not only serves as a potential substitute for human creativity in general, but also threatens to displace specific artists by reproducing their unique artistic stylesArtistic styles. A distinct artistic style serves as an economic asset for an artist, but also as a reflection of their personal identity. Therefore, safeguarding the continued development of such artistic styles is essential not only to protecting economic opportunities for artists but also to preserving their artistic integrity and fostering a culturally rich, human-centric creative landscape. Nevertheless, granting extensive legal protection to individual artistic stylesArtistic styles poses significant challenges. ImitationImitation and adaptation of artistic styles have always been integral to human creativity. CopyrightCopyright law addresses this by being cautious of not affording monopolies over ideas but by granting protection to expressionsExpression of ideas. While stylistic features, particularly in visual arts, can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from original creative expressions protectable by copyrightCopyright, this chapter suggests that such features may not play a central role in assessing infringement, as doing so could risk undue limitations on the creative freedom of others. Instead, it argues that efforts should focus on upholding moral rights to prevent false attribution of works not created by the artist and to protect against derogatory treatments of works that could harm the artist’s reputation. Finally, it is suggested that intellectual property rights and remuneration models adapt to the changing creative landscape by allowing artists to be compensated for the use of their names to generate new works specifically designed to reproduce their artistic stylesArtistic styles.

Keywords: Artistic style; Copyright; Generative artificial intelligence; Intellectual property rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:perchp:978-981-95-2058-9_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789819520589

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-2058-9_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().