Green Economy: Opportunities for Reshaping Personal Transportation? Between Tough Technological Choices and Induced Client Behavior

Klaus Bruno Schebesch () and Horațiu Șoim
Additional contact information
Klaus Bruno Schebesch: Western University Arad
Horațiu Șoim: Western University Arad

Chapter Chapter 16 in Post-Pandemic Realities and Growth in Eastern Europe, 2022, pp 273-288 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract One of today’s pressing problems is how to take environmentally responsible action within the transportation sector, especially when faced with difficult alternatives, that is, choices between alternatives which are by nature multicriterial. This leads to problems with objectives which resemble those of strategic games and to a lesser extend those of uncertainty-facing technical decisions. In the medium to long run, such choices also lead to binding consequences and sometimes to undesirable outcomes. By now public opinion – at least in developed economies – seems to prefer environmental intervention over inactivity. While there is overwhelming awareness and evidence of the environmental harm caused by our lifestyle in an industrialized and overpopulated world, there is much less consensus over what mitigating actions should be taken. In order to highlight both the difficulty and the risk associated which such action, we portrait the situation from a country (Romania) which does not enjoy much reassurance concerning the longer-term viability of implementing far-reaching environmental reforms: The lack of any noteworthy societal tradition in favor of determined environmental action combined with the absence of “patient” capital may undermine progress. Simultaneously, there is widespread hope of gaining a much higher living standard by more aggressive, quantitative economic growth. This situation may be typical for most emerging economies, that is, for the bigger part of the world population. We propose to represent the choice along two main dimensions, namely, (a) choice of vehicle propulsion type and (b) ownership structure of the means of transportation. The factors contributing to narrowing down the choices may be subdivided into (1) embodied technical advances and fleet age, (2) costs raised by different degrees of closing of resource cycles, (3) aspects of relieving traffic congestions and reducing delays, and (4) re-planning and re-purposing use of urban space. Possible follow-up effects and the chances of eventual implementation are discussed.

Keywords: Sustainability; Transportation policies; Ownership; Behavioral economics; Intelligent recommenders (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-09421-7_16

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031094217

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-09421-7_16

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().