LLMs as Your Second Brain - How AI Will Affect the Way We Solve Problems

Phineas Speicher () and Lutz Becker ()
Additional contact information
Phineas Speicher: Fresenius University of Applied Sciences
Lutz Becker: Fresenius University of Applied Sciences

A chapter in Digital Management and Artificial Intelligence, 2025, pp 456-475 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This study uniquely investigates the influence of ChatGPT and persona patterns on the problem-solving process in the context of complex problems. The focus is on how these technologies are evaluated for problem analysis and how they influence problem understanding, the quantity and quality of solution approaches, and the problem solvers’ sense of uncertainty, depending on persona patterns. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines quantitative and qualitative research methods. In an experimental design, 99 participants used ChatGPT to create issue trees to analyze a complex home office problem (loss of productivity) - once with and once without persona patterns. Using qualitative methods, the quality of the issue trees was compared with a reference. The results show that ChatGPT can be an effective tool for supporting the problem-solving process. Although the structure of the issue trees did not differ between the groups, the use of ChatGPT significantly improved the perceived understanding of the problem, the quantity and quality of perceived possible solutions, and the subjective sense of certainty. Using persona patterns had no significant additional effect on the psychological variables. The study indicates that ChatGPT is suitable to support thought processes in the image of the “second brain” and should, therefore, be augmented as often as possible. The use of personas should be directly related to the problem context. Exploratory analyses suggest that the influence of ChatGPT could be more pronounced in participants with less prior knowledge. These findings have far-reaching implications for integrating AI into problem-solving processes in organizational contexts and open new research perspectives on the nature of AI-generated problem analyses. A small sample size and psychometric limitations restrict the study’s findings. For further research, it is recommended that the study be repeated with higher resources, recommended methodological improvements be integrated, and overall problem-solving processes with ChatGPT be evaluated in longitudinal studies.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; problem analysis; problem solving; persona patterns; wicked problems; Home Office (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-88052-0_37

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031880520

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-88052-0_37

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().