Evaluating the Effects of Financial Fraud and Board Governance on Going Concern Performance of Africa Non-Industrial Firms

Jeremiah O. Akinadewo (), Ifeoluwa M. Adebiyi (), Temitayo O. Abe (), Israel S. Akinadewo (), Alani O. Efuntade (), Adebolanle A. Debo-Ajagunna () and Oluwasayo H. Omomeji
Additional contact information
Jeremiah O. Akinadewo: Afe Babalola University
Ifeoluwa M. Adebiyi: Afe Babalola University
Temitayo O. Abe: Afe Babalola University
Israel S. Akinadewo: University of Ilesa
Alani O. Efuntade: Federal University Oye-Ekiti
Adebolanle A. Debo-Ajagunna: Afe Babalola University
Oluwasayo H. Omomeji: Afe Babalola University

A chapter in Embracing Technological Agility in Accounting and Business – Vol. 1, 2026, pp 363-379 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Studies have been conducted on the interplay between financial fraud and the performance of firms, most especially as it relates to the threats to the going concern. The concern shown by these scholars has elicited the focus of this study in examining how the nexus between these variables impacts Africa firms. This study evaluated the effects of financial fraud and board governance on the going concern performance of African non-industrial firms. Using an ex post facto research design, secondary data from 439 listed non-industrial firms in the MachameRatios DataPC between 2012 and 2023 were analysed using longitudinal panel regression in STATA. Results reveal a statistically significant and inverse relationship between financial fraud and going concern performance, indicating that increases in fraudulent activity are associated with declines in financial sustainability. Furthermore, board governance measured by audit committee independence and board gender diversity was found to significantly moderate this relationship, mitigating the negative impact of fraud on performance. These findings underscore the critical role of governance in sustaining firms in weak institutional environments. The study recommends that firms enhance audit committee oversight, enforce gender-diverse board structures, and implement proactive fraud detection mechanisms. However, the study is limited by its focus on listed firms and reliance on quantitative data, which may not capture behavioural and cultural dimensions of fraud. Future studies are encouraged to adopt mixed-method approaches and broaden the scope to include private and public sector entities across African economies.

Keywords: Asset growth; Audit committee independence; Board gender diversity; Financial fraud; Profit growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-13380-9_23

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032133809

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-13380-9_23

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().