Exploring the Opportunities, Risks, and Constraints of the use of GenAI Tools in Higher Learning Institutions: A Mixed-Methods Study of Rwandan University Students

Gatera Antoine (), Kambombo Mtonga, Kuradusenge Martin, Turinimana Jean Bosco and Nsengiyumva Jean Bosco
Additional contact information
Gatera Antoine: University of Rwanda, Department of Information Systems, College of Science and Technology
Kambombo Mtonga: Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, Department of Mathematical Sciences
Kuradusenge Martin: University of Rwanda, Department of Information Systems, College of Science and Technology
Turinimana Jean Bosco: University of Technology and Arts of Byumba (UTAB), Department of Education in Sciences
Nsengiyumva Jean Bosco: University of Technology and Arts of Byumba (UTAB), Department of Education in Sciences

A chapter in Advancement in Embedded and Mobile Systems, 2026, pp 453-463 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract With the introduction of Generative AI (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT, the educational environment has completely changed and university students now have tremendous access to individualized learning resources. This work aimed to investigate the opportunities, risks, and constraints that university students can encounter due to the use of resources produced by GenAI. In particular, the study determined which GenAI tools students use the most, evaluated their effects on the learning process and critical thinking, and writing skills. This study used a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to obtain in-depth information from a wide range of students in Rwandan universities. In addition to demonstrating the advantages and disadvantages of using GenAI tools in higher education institutions, the findings will provide educators, and students practical suggestions for enhancing the safe and efficient use of these technologies in the teaching and learning process. As results, it was revealed that 80% of respondents were aware of the GenAI tools while only 20% not aware. The most used was ChatGPT where, 65% of the respondents said they mostly use it. Gen AI tools are mainly used for research purpose 51% and have helped them to improve their academic performance.

Keywords: GenAI; AI for learning; Critical thinking; Higher learning institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-031-99219-3_31

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031992193

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-99219-3_31

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Progress in IS from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().