Can short sellers constrain aggressive non-GAAP reporting?
Nilabhra Bhattacharya (),
Theodore E. Christensen (),
Qunfeng Liao () and
Bo Ouyang ()
Additional contact information
Nilabhra Bhattacharya: Southern Methodist University
Theodore E. Christensen: University of Georgia
Qunfeng Liao: Oakland University
Bo Ouyang: Pennsylvania State University
Review of Accounting Studies, 2022, vol. 27, issue 2, No 1, 440 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Prior research finds an association between short selling volume and aggressive non-GAAP earnings disclosures but does not explore whether increased short selling pressure actually constrains aggressive non-GAAP reporting. Attribution of causality is problematic in this setting due to multiple self-selection issues. Firms self-select into providing non-GAAP performance metrics, and they also decide the timing of these disclosures strategically. Furthermore, short sellers carefully select the stocks they want to short. We exploit a randomized natural experiment—the SEC’s Regulation SHO—as an exogenous shock to mitigate endogeneity concerns and investigate the causal effect of short selling on the proliferation of aggressive non-GAAP reporting. The specific starting and ending dates of Regulation SHO allow us to conduct two separate difference-in-differences (DiD) tests. Our double DiD analyses indicate that the threat of increased short selling prompted by Regulation SHO significantly curbs managers’ aggressive non-GAAP earnings disclosures. However, the regulation does not affect non-GAAP exclusions that are presumed to be nonstrategic and informative. We find that short sellers’ disciplining effect is stronger when the pre-disclosure information environment is relatively impoverished and corporate governance is weak. Our results are robust to extensive sensitivity testing. Overall, we find strong evidence that the threat of increased short selling constrains aggressive non-GAAP reporting.
Keywords: Non-GAAP earnings; Short sellers; Regulation SHO; Earnings management; M41; D53; G14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-021-09621-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:27:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-021-09621-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-021-09621-9
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer
More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().