EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Auditor conservatism, audit quality, and real consequences for clients

Curtis Hall (), J. Scott Judd () and Jayanthi Sunder ()
Additional contact information
Curtis Hall: Drexel University
J. Scott Judd: University of Illinois at Chicago
Jayanthi Sunder: University of Arizona

Review of Accounting Studies, 2023, vol. 28, issue 2, No 9, 689-725

Abstract: Abstract Auditors tend to be more conservative in their audits when they face greater litigation risk. However, it is unclear whether this conservatism is always desirable or whether it can be excessive. To evaluate the usefulness of greater auditor conservatism, we examine whether auditor conservatism improves audit quality and imposes real operating consequences for clients. We examine auditor behavior in a sample of auditors’ client banks, when one of the auditor’s other client banks fails (as deemed by the FDIC). We find that auditors that experience a bank failure within their portfolio become more conservative for surviving clients. However, we find that the larger loan loss provisions at surviving clients are no more timely, are less accurate, and reverse in subsequent periods. This finding suggests that auditors’ initial portfolio-wide response to a specific client failure may be overly conservative. We also document that surviving client banks face real consequences in terms of constraints on their lending because of the auditor’s excessive conservatism. Overall, we conclude that, in some situations, auditors may overreact, leading to excessive conservatism, which in turn has adverse consequences for clients.

Keywords: Auditor conservatism; Auditor portfolios; Reporting quality; Loan loss provisions; G21; M41; M42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-021-09653-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:28:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-021-09653-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142

DOI: 10.1007/s11142-021-09653-1

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer

More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:28:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-021-09653-1