Time Matters. Tempocentrism—Key Impediment for Transcultural Processes

Werner Zips () and Angelica V. Marte ()
Additional contact information
Werner Zips: University of Vienna
Angelica V. Marte: Zeppelin University

A chapter in A Relational View on Cultural Complexity, 2023, pp 147-171 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract We interpret the core agenda of this volume as the development of theories for governance practice(s) in management and leadership based on (cultural) commonality and diversity. Our contribution will explore a multi-disciplinary approach marrying concepts from relational economics and leadership research with broader analytical perspectives of anthropology. We will discuss how anthropological concepts of transculturality and transculturation transplanted into the field of relational economics could translate into change and transformation by diversity. To have a substantial impact, cultural (and biological) diversity depends on de-essentializing perceptions of rigid identities and fixed identifications, enabling a complementary or truly transcultural comprehension of relational “otherness”. Such an oscillating open-ended procedure resists dominant orderings of “otherness” as pre-conceived labeling and leads to a permanent discursive reflection of diversity and cultural difference/s. It acknowledges that identification of divergences is more often than not stereotypical. Practically, this means for us to draw our main interest to all levels of (power) hierarchies in corporations, organizations, and networks. Leadership strategies cannot prescribe top-down transcultural change, if no more than window dressing is attempted. Therefore, we suggest strengthening bottom-up approaches aimed to promote social and environmental justice through transcultural procedures. We are convinced that the transformative upsurge should not be restricted to the narrow confines of the social sphere of “human resources” but must address the devastating impact of human economic activities on nature in the “Anthropocene”. Relational economics and its underlying concept of relationality will have to extend to all ends of human/social embeddedness in natural processes and ecosystems. Taking relationality seriously means thinking (and acting) in terms of decolonizing nature from centuries of human interventions of progressively suspending ecological self-regulation. The practical aim of this contribution is geared toward substituting the once dominant habitus of tempocentrism with effective and accountable sustainability. The triple ecological crisis of the coronavirus pandemic, species extinction, and climate change needs urgent institutionalization of sustainable transformation or “timefulness”. We thus provide a critique of the long-standing norm of “time (money) matters” and argue for historicization of time (as temporal) matters in research of transculturality.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:recchp:978-3-031-27454-1_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031274541

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-27454-1_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Relational Economics and Organization Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().