EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Similarities in axiomatizations: equal surplus division value and first-price auctions

Takumi Kongo ()
Additional contact information
Takumi Kongo: Fukuoka University

Review of Economic Design, 2020, vol. 24, issue 3, No 5, 199-213

Abstract: Abstract We compare axiomatizations between a value for cooperative games with transferable utilities (TU games), and a rule for auctions. The equal surplus division value on the set of zero-monotonic TU games is characterized by the following: individual rationality, Pareto efficiency, and equal effect of players’ nullification on others. Meanwhile, first-price auctions, on the general preference domain, are characterized by individual rationality, envy-freeness, and weak equal effect of buyers’ nullification on others. Here, envy-freeness implies Pareto efficiency in the model of auctions. Given the agents’ general preferences in the auction model, the characteristic of a weak equal effect of buyers’ nullification on others weakens the requirement of equal effect of players’ nullification on others. Although the two models are different, the corresponding axioms in both models require conditions corresponding to each other. In particular, individual rationality requires voluntary participation of agents, Pareto efficiency (or its stronger axiom of envy-freeness in the model of auctions) requires outcomes with no waste, and (weak) equal effect of players’ (buyers’) nullification on others requires equal treatment of agents when an agent is nullified. Therefore, in terms of axiomatizations, we can similarly interpret the equal surplus division value and first-price auctions.

Keywords: Axiomatization; Equal surplus division value; First-price auction; Nullification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 D44 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10058-020-00233-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reecde:v:24:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10058-020-00233-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10058

DOI: 10.1007/s10058-020-00233-4

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economic Design is currently edited by Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Fuhito Kojima and Tilman Börgers

More articles in Review of Economic Design from Springer, Society for Economic Design
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:reecde:v:24:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10058-020-00233-4