The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates

Pedro Albarran (), Juan A. Crespo, Ignacio Ortuño and Javier Ruiz-Castillo
Additional contact information
Juan A. Crespo: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Ignacio Ortuño: Universidad Carlos III

Scientometrics, 2011, vol. 88, issue 2, No 4, 385-397

Abstract: Abstract This paper studies evidence from Thomson Scientific (TS) about the citation process of 3.7 million articles published in the period 1998–2002 in 219 Web of Science (WoS) categories, or sub-fields. Reference and citation distributions have very different characteristics across sub-fields. However, when analyzed with the Characteristic Scores and Scales (CSS) technique, which is replication and scale invariant, the shape of these distributions over three broad categories of articles appears strikingly similar. Reference distributions are mildly skewed, but citation distributions with a 5-year citation window are highly skewed: the mean is 20 points above the median, while 9–10% of all articles in the upper tail account for about 44% of all citations. The aggregation of sub-fields into disciplines and fields according to several aggregation schemes preserve this feature of citation distributions. It should be noted that when we look into subsets of articles within the lower and upper tails of citation distributions the universality partially breaks down. On the other hand, for 140 of the 219 sub-fields the existence of a power law cannot be rejected. However, contrary to what is generally believed, at the sub-field level the scaling parameter is above 3.5 most of the time, and power laws are relatively small: on average, they represent 2% of all articles and account for 13.5% of all citations. The results of the aggregation into disciplines and fields reveal that power law algebra is a subtle phenomenon.

Keywords: Research performance; Citation analysis; Power laws; Characteristic Scores (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-011-0407-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates (2011)
Working Paper: The Skewness of Science in 219 Sub-Fields and a Number of Aggregates (2010)
Working Paper: The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:88:y:2011:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0407-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0407-9

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().