EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Two-tier corporate board structure, corporate governance reforms and financial performance of firms listed on the China stock market

Takuriramunashe Famba (), Lloyd Chiriseri (), Grace Chituku-Dzimiro () and Ophias Kurauone ()
Additional contact information
Takuriramunashe Famba: Bindura University of Science Education
Lloyd Chiriseri: Bindura University of Science Education
Grace Chituku-Dzimiro: Chinhoyi University of Technology
Ophias Kurauone: Zimbabwe Open University

SN Business & Economics, 2024, vol. 4, issue 11, 1-32

Abstract: Abstract Recently, in 2021 the standing committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) 13th congress issued the draft amendment to the company law in order to strengthen corporate governance practices in China. It is therefore imperative that the likely effects of these corporate governance policy changes on financial performance be investigated. Specifically, the current study focuses on the implications of proposed changes to the board structure to scratch the upper limit board size (currently 13), scrap supervisors and allow small companies to operate without a board. Using a dynamic panel system generalized methods of moments (GMM) estimator to alleviate endogeneity concerns we determine the effect of the two-tier corporate board structure on the performance of a panel of 1256 Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2018. The results of this study reveal that the two-tier board hypothesis is not efficient. Although the main board size and independence have positive effect on performance, supervisory boards have a negative effect on performance measured by both Tobin’s Q (TQ) and return on assets (ROA). We also observed that the main board meetings have a positive effect on performance contrary to the supervisory board. Furthermore, results reveal that boards are equally important for small firms as they are for larger ones. Our results support the removal of the cap on board size, the removal of the supervisory board, but do not support the removal of the main board for small firms.

Keywords: China corporate governance; The company law; Tobin’s Q; ROA; Dynamic system GMM; Two-tier board; Board size; Board independence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-024-00729-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:4:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s43546-024-00729-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/43546

DOI: 10.1007/s43546-024-00729-z

Access Statistics for this article

SN Business & Economics is currently edited by Gino D'Oca

More articles in SN Business & Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:4:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s43546-024-00729-z