Any Hope outside of the Dual Earner Model? Health in Male and Female Breadwinner Families across Institutional Contexts in Europe

Clémentine Rossier () and Gina Potarca
Additional contact information
Clémentine Rossier: University of Geneva
Gina Potarca: University of Liverpool

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 2025, vol. 177, issue 3, No 16, 1347-1365

Abstract: Abstract According to work-family conflict (WFC) theory, fathers in full-time employment are in better health than jobless/part-time fathers across institutional contexts in Europe, while mothers in full-time employment are in worse health than jobless/part-time mothers in countries with insufficient institutional support, but in better health elsewhere. In this paper we test whether “couple-level work arrangements” (dual earner, male breadwinner, female breadwinner) also matter today for mothers’ and fathers’ health, on top of their individual work situation, leading to some departures from WFC predictions. As dual earner (DE) families become more widespread, the male breadwinner (MB) arrangement may have become less attractive across contexts, leading to negative selection into such arrangements and worse health for mothers in conservative contexts and perhaps for fathers in progressive contexts. Concomitantly, the female breadwinner (FB) family model, while gaining in numerical weight, may encounter forms of societal resistance in more conservative settings, negatively affecting mothers’ double burden and health compared to DE mothers. Using European Social Survey data (2004–2018, 31 countries), we compare the self-rated health of mothers and fathers (with children below age 13) in DE, MB and FB couples across different welfare state contexts, controlling for income. We find, as expected, that MB mothers nowadays rarely exhibit a health advantage, even in less supportive institutional contexts in Europe; on the other hand, there is still no health disadvantage for fathers in MB families, even in more progressive countries. FB mothers are in worse health than DE mothers only in Eastern European countries. These results are robust to various specifications regarding couple-level work arrangement categories, country typology, or sample used.

Keywords: Self-rated health; Family models; Gendered division of work; Mothers’ employment; Gender norms; Family policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03539-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:soinre:v:177:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03539-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11135

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03539-4

Access Statistics for this article

Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement is currently edited by Filomena Maggino

More articles in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().