Geophysical Sensors for Mapping Soil Layers – A Comparative Case Study Using Different Electrical and Electromagnetic Sensors

Erika Lück (), Julien Guillemoteau, Jens Tronicke, Jana Klose and Benjamin Trost
Additional contact information
Erika Lück: Institute of Geosciences
Julien Guillemoteau: Institute of Geosciences
Jens Tronicke: Institute of Geosciences
Jana Klose: Institute of Geosciences
Benjamin Trost: Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB)

A chapter in Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture—Theme I: Sensors, 2022, pp 267-287 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In agriculture, site-specific field management is based on several components including information regarding soil heterogeneity. Mobile geophysical sensors are useful tools to efficiently map the spatial distribution of physical parameters (e.g., electrical conductivity) for large areas (i.e., several hectares and more). In combination with the analysis of soil samples collected at selected points, these maps represent a database for decision-making, e.g., for programming and controlling fertilizer spreaders. In addition, multi-channel instruments not only provide data regarding lateral changes within a certain depth range, rather they also allow for reliable imaging of possible soil layers within the depth of investigation. The reliability of the geophysical parameter models (e.g., electrical conductivity model) is controlled by the conductivity and their contrasts and by the used sensor. A case study is presented in which the electromagnetic sensor DUALEM-21 is used at an agricultural field characterized by sandy soils (i.e., low electrical conductivity) including a relative homogeneous topsoil (i.e., with only minor differentiation). At our test site, the final geophysical parameter maps generated using DUALEM-21, are compared to the results obtained using a rolling electrode system (Geophilus) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR). All methods reveal similar patterns of soil heterogeneity. In addition, the conductivity-depth models resulting from kinematic surveys are in good agreement with those from conventional static electrical measurements and with the data from soil analysis of borehole samples. Thus, the results of our case study demonstrate that the DUALEM-21 can also be used successfully on sandy soils to map the lateral conductivity variation and possible layers within the root zone (i.e., the upper 1.5 m).

Keywords: Geophysical sensors; Electrical conductivity; DUALEM; Geophilus; Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-030-84144-7_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030841447

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-84144-7_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Optimization and Its Applications from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().