Clinical Data where Variability is more Important than Averages

Ton J. Cleophas, Aeilko H. Zwinderman and Toine F. Cleophas
Additional contact information
Ton J. Cleophas: European Interuniversity College of Pharmaceutical Medicine Lyon
Aeilko H. Zwinderman: Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Department Biostatistics and Epidemiology
Toine F. Cleophas: Technical University

Chapter Chapter 26 in Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials, 2006, pp 297-306 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In clinical studies, efficacies of new treatments are usually assessed by comparing averages of new treatment results versus control or placebo. However, averages do not tell the whole story, and the spread of the data may be more relevant. E.g., when we assess how a drug reaches various organs, variability of drug concentrations is important, as in some cases too little and in other cases dangerously high levels get through. Also, for the assessment of the pharmacological response to a drug, variabilities may be important. E.g., the effects on circadian glucose levels in patients with diabetes mellitus of a slow-release-insulin and acute-release-insulin formula are different. The latter formula is likely to produce more low and high glucose levels than the former formula. Spread or variability of the data is a determinant of diabetic control, and predictor of hypoglycaemic/hyperglycemic events. As an example, in a parallel-group study of n = 200 the former and latter formulas produced mean glucoses of 7.9 and 7.1 mmol/l, while standard deviations were 4.2 and 8.4 mmol/l respectively. This suggests that, although the slow-release formula did not produce a better mean glucose level, it did produce a smaller spread in the data. How do we test these kinds of data. Clinical investigators, although they are generally familiar with testing differences between averages, have difficulties testing differences between variabilities. The current chapter gives examples of situations where variability is more relevant than averages. It also gives simple statistical methods for testing such data. Statistical tests comparing mean values instead of variabilities are relatively simple and are one method everyone seems to learn. It is a service to the readership of this book to put more emphasis on variability.

Keywords: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor; Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement; Circadian Blood Pressure; Testing Variability; Blood Glucose Variability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4020-4650-6_26

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781402046506

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4650-6_26

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().