 The Modern AtomistsEli Maor
Chapter 28 in To Infinity and Beyond, 1987, pp 224-226 from Springer Abstract: Abstract In our story of the infinite we have looked mainly at the infinitely large, perhaps because it has received so much attention since Cantor’s pioneering work in the 1880s, perhaps also because there seems to be something about the infinitely large that captures the imagination in a way that the infinitely small cannot. This bias, however, is hardly justified. In the history of mathematics the infinitely small has played a role at least as important as its counterpart on the other extreme of the scale. If nothing else, it lies at the root of the notion of continuity, an idea that goes back all the way to the Greeks, whose philosophers heatedly debated the possibility of endless division. And much later, disguised as the infinitesimal, it would become the cornerstone around which the calculus was developed.1 In any event, from a purely mathematical point of view the distinction between “large” and “small” is not really as fundamental as it may seem, since we can always use the function y = 1/x (or its two-dimensional equivalent, the transformation of inversion) to change the one into the other. Date: 1987 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4612-5394-5_28 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5394-5_28 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Springer Books from Springer |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.