EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Compactness

Lynn Arthur Steen and J. Arthur Seebach
Additional contact information
Lynn Arthur Steen: Saint Olaf College
J. Arthur Seebach: Saint Olaf College

Chapter Section 3 in Counterexamples in Topology, 1978, pp 18-27 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract A space satisfies a certain separation axiom only if the topology contains enough open sets to provide disjoint neighborhoods for certain disjoint sets. Compactness, however, limits the number of open sets in a topology, for every open cover of a compact topological space must contain a finite sub-cover. This difference between the separation axioms and the various forms of compactness is illustrated in the extreme by the double pointed finite complement topology (Example 18.7) which is not even T0 yet does satisfy all the forms of compactness.

Date: 1978
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4612-6290-9_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781461262909

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-6290-9_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-08
Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4612-6290-9_3