Software Implementations

René Michel, Igor Schnakenburg and Tobias von Martens
Additional contact information
René Michel: Deutsche Bank AG
Igor Schnakenburg: DeTeCon International GmbH
Tobias von Martens: Deutsche Bank AG

Chapter Chapter 7 in Targeting Uplift, 2019, pp 147-189 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter looks at different software implementations in order to mention which net scoring methods have been implemented in software packages and how those packages have to be handled. Different implementations, such as SAS, R, Pitney Bowes, and others, are presented and comments on their level of proficiency but also on their shortcomings are given. Remarks will be made with respect to the usability and the comfort offered by the different packages with regard to uplift model development, scoring, evaluation, deployment, and visualizations. For each presented software, some general comments on the provider and the package will be made. We detail the way that model preparation is supported, model building and scoring are handled, evaluation is implemented, and a roll-out may be automated. In the end, a comparative study will be presented where a net scoring model is built with each software on an identical dataset.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-22625-1_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030226251

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22625-1_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().