EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Matching Case Identification Hypotheses and Case-Level Data Analysis

Arch G. Woodside ()
Additional contact information
Arch G. Woodside: Yonsei University, Yonsei Frontier Lab

Chapter Chapter 1 in Accurate Case Outcome Modeling, 2019, pp 1-24 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The traditional and still dominant logic among nearly all empirical positivist researchers in schools of management is to write symmetric (two directional) variable hypotheses (SVH), even though the same researchers formulate their behavioral theories at the case (typology) identification level. The behavioral theory of the firm (Cyert and March, A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1963), the theory of buyer behavior (Howard and Sheth, The theory of Buyer behavior. Wiley, New York, 1969)), and Miles and Snow’s (Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw Hill, New York, 1978) typologies of organizations’ strategy configurations (e.g., “prospectors, analyzers, and defenders”) are iconic examples of formulating theory at the case identification level. When testing such theories, most researchers automatically, nonconsciously, switch from building theory of beliefs, attitudes, and behavior at the case identification level to empirically testing of two-directional relationships and additive net-effect influences of variables. Formulating theory focusing on creating case identification hypotheses (CIH) to describe, explain, and predict behavior and then empirically testing at SVH is a mismatch and results in shallow data analysis and frequently inaccurate contributions to theory. This chapter describes the mismatch and resulting unattractive outcomes as well as the pervasive practice of examining only fit validity in empirical studies using symmetric tests. The chapter reviews studies in the literature showing how matching both case-based theory and empirical positivist research of CIH is possible and produces findings that advance useful theory and critical thinking by executives and researchers.

Keywords: Behavior; Case; Empiricism; Management; Theory; Variable (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-26818-3_1

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030268183

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26818-3_1

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2026-05-22
Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-26818-3_1