Happiness as a Descriptive Standard or as a Standard to be Pursued

Jan Ott ()
Additional contact information
Jan Ott: Erasmus University

Chapter Chapter 8 in Beyond Economics, 2020, pp 107-124 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract It is not self-evident that happiness should be used as a standard in our personal life or in politics. We can make value-free inventories of pros and cons and suggest some options. There are different modalities. Happiness can be used as a descriptive standard to detect problems, to be put on the agenda, but also in a more ambitious way to decide about priorities. In classical utilitarianism happiness can be used as a standard to maximize happiness in general; in negative utilitarianism it can be used as a standard to minimize unhappiness first of all. It is practical to summarize first how confusion about happiness has been reduced, in view of the current definition and results of research. Decisions to use happiness as a descriptive standard, or as a standard to be pursued, are not value-free. Before we decide we should have a brief look at possible tensions with alternative standards.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-56600-5_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030566005

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56600-5_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().