Imperfect Mechanisms for the Use and Protection of Intellectual Property as an Organizational Barrier in the Movement to Global Technological Leadership
Alexander Litvinenko,
Julia Lozina and
Lyudmila Chernikova
Additional contact information
Alexander Litvinenko: Saint Petersburg University of MIA of Russia
Julia Lozina: Saint Petersburg University of MIA of Russia
Lyudmila Chernikova: Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Chapter Chapter 15 in Technology and Business Strategy, 2021, pp 211-223 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract With the development of modern digital technology, and competition growth in the intellectual capital field among global economic leaders, this chapter, which focuses on overcoming organizational barriers in intellectual property use and current protection systems, is of particular relevance. The aim of the chapter is to cover the full extent and order of these study areas in Russia, making use of global experience, for the purposes of securing Russia’s position as a world technological leader. The methodology of the chapter includes analysis of international treaties and analytics, and a comparative analysis of approaches to constructing key elements of intellectual property management mechanisms in multiple countries (the United States, Germany, China) and in Russia. The chapter contains a comparative assessment of innovational indicators both in Russian and in other countries. By means of content analysis, we have identified the advantages certain countries possess in the field of intellectual property protection. An institutional approach makes it possible to identify specific features of intellectual property use and protection. The authors’ conclusions address the degree to which the existing mechanism of intellectual property management in Russia corresponds to the tasks set forward by state policy on the path toward global technological leadership. The conclusion offers a number of particular solutions to Russia overcoming organizational barriers in use of innovation, and gives recommendations on intellectual property protection.
Keywords: Technological sovereignty; Intellectual property; Digital economy; Economic growth; Innovation; O1; O3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-63974-7_15
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030639747
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63974-7_15
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().