Interrogating Social Capital and Denials of Development in the Planning for Tribal Development in India

Bhabani Shankar Nayak
Additional contact information
Bhabani Shankar Nayak: University for the Creative Arts

Chapter Chapter 3 in Political Economy of Development and Business, 2022, pp 43-60 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The failure of the colonial Indian state to institutionalise, intervene and regulate development policy for the benefit of people, especially for the tribals, has led to a new wave constitutional planning for affirmative action in postcolonial India. This wave has basically been associated with the shift of power from the colonial rule to the nationalistic ethos reflected during the Indian freedom struggle, giving prominence to the state for the welfare activities with a special provision for the development of the tribals. However, after more than six decades of Indian independence and planning for development has failed to achieve the basic developmental objectives while looking at tribal development. It indicates that the postcolonial Indian state has also failed by and large to institutionalise, intervene and regulate development policy to achieve the objective of the welfare of the marginalised people, that is, tribals. In such a context, the currency of the so-called transformative language, such as ‘development’, ‘empowerment’, ‘participation’ or ‘capacity building’, is undermined by the process of ‘integration and assimilation’ approach towards the tribal development policy of postcolonial Indian state. Furthermore, with the inception of new economic policy (liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation), shifting power from the state to the market rather than to the poor made tribal development policy more vulnerable. Ultimately, both the weakening of state and its welfare policies indirectly denied tribal development. Thus, the policy for tribal development and an alternatives political leverage is necessary for appropriate development policy and practice for the tribals. This chapter seeks to discuss tribal development policy and its history of denials for development to the tribal people of India. This chapter also tries to interrogate the idea of ‘social capital’ in the process of the discussion on tribal development in India. The contemporary policy makers of tribal development in India were putting blame on the lack of the use of social capital as the major factor for underdevelopment of tribals and their area. It looks as if it is one of the ways to shift the institutional responsibility of the Indian state towards its historically deprived citizens, the tribals. The chapter tries to question the bureaucratic and apolitical answers to tribal underdevelopment and presents the paradigm of development policy for tribals as well.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-11093-1_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031110931

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-11093-1_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().