The Intimate Interplay Between Experimentation and Deduction: Some Classroom Implications

Michael de Villiers () and Hans Niels Jahnke ()
Additional contact information
Michael de Villiers: Stellenbosch University
Hans Niels Jahnke: University of Duisberg-Essen, Faculty of Mathematics

A chapter in Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice, 2024, pp 2551-2586 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract We understand experimental mathematics as the systematic experimental investigation of concrete examples of a mathematical structure in the search for conjectures about its properties. Experiments might be done by pencil-and-paper work, building physical models, and, of course, by using available computer programs for doing time-consuming calculations, geometric constructions, and other types of visualizations. The guiding intention of the chapter is the study of the interplay of experimentation and deduction (proof) in the context of the teaching of mathematics at lower and upper secondary schools as well as the education of teachers of mathematics. The didactical intentions of the chapter make it necessary to take a special philosophical perspective, which might be characterized as a combination of Lakatosian and non-Lakatosian viewpoints (Sect. 2). In Sect. 3 we shortly discuss three historical examples (Euler, Fourier series, Chinese Remainder Theorem) to give a more realistic image of the interplay between experimentation and deduction in contrast to the somewhat artificial character which didactical examples necessarily involve. In the following Sects. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, we discuss a few classroom examples of mathematical experimentation. Section 4 is on checking, guessing, and finding a proof, and in Sect. 5 we put a particular emphasis on finding and handling counterexamples. These two sections can be characterized as the classical domain of Lakatosian ideas transferred to the classroom. Section 6 explores the potential of viewing elementary Euclidean geometry from the point of view of statics. This approach has had a long tradition in mathematics since ancient times and represents a transition to discussing experimentation with hypotheses in Sect. 7 on modelling. The latter is definitely a non-Lakatosian viewpoint. Lastly, in Sect. 8 it is concluded that the interplay between experimentation and deduction needs to be incorporated in primary education and extended throughout for the long-term development of sound mathematical thinking and understanding of students.

Keywords: Experimentation; Deduction; Proof; Checking; Guessing; Refutation; Modelling; Lakatosian and non-Lakatosian points of view (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-40846-5_40

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031408465

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-40846-5_40

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().