A Lingua Franca for Kurdish Populations

Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, Victor Ginsburgh, Hossein Hassani () and Shlomo Weber ()
Additional contact information
Hossein Hassani: University of Kurdistan Hewlêr, Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Shlomo Weber: New Uzbekistan University

Chapter Chapter 21 in The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language, 2026, pp 575-593 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Kurdish languages and multiple dialects spread across several nation-states under various regimes varying from regional recognition (e.g. Iraq) to persistent attrition (e.g. Turkey). Kurdish linguistic faces a variety of challenges which can be attributed to different causes such as the historical background of the language, sociopolitical reasons, and forced compliance with national linguistic policies in some of the countries where Kurds live to name a few. In this chapter we do not discuss the normative issue of linguistic rights entitlements of the speakers of different varieties of Kurdish. We consider their complex sociolinguistic situation from the point of view of communication efficiency in the face of the following dilemma: Either unification through the adoption of a lingua franca or standardized Kurdish, with the implication of disenfranchisement of some speakers, or the maintenance of multiple dialects, with the risk of fractionalization and its political and economic consequences. For reasons such as the multi-dialect feature of the language and its sociocultural attributes, the attempts to standardize Kurdish have not succeeded. To address this dilemma, we proceed to compute the lexical-linguistic distances between six dialects of Kurdish: three which are representative of Kurmanji and three of Sorani, that is, the two main linguistic and regional varieties of Kurdish. Our selection of dialects, although incomplete, covers about 75% of the whole population of Kurdish speakers. Our study is the first one to propose an application of the Jaro-similarity index on a Swadesh-list of dialects of Kurdish. Our results reveal some significant distance within Sorani and Kurmanji dialects, and an expected more significant distance between Sorani and Kurmanji dialects. The latter distance is sufficiently important to favor a three-language policy rather than any other one: an international language, the national language (Turkish, Farsi, or Arabic), and the local Kurdish variety. This policy maximizes efficiency, Kurdish identity as well as within and without group intercommunication. We compare it to similar linguistic policy attempts in India, Nigeria, and Kazakhstan.

Keywords: Kurdish languages; Lexicographical distances; Three-language formula; Lingua franca: Group identity; Efficient communication; Levenshtein method; Jaro distance; Swadesh list; Inter-group comprehension (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: A Lingua Franca for Kurdish Populations (2021)
Working Paper: A Lingua Franca for Kurdish Populations (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-88240-1_21

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031882401

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-88240-1_21

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().