Challenges of Adhering Technology 4.0 in Agriculture: A Perspective on Small Properties

Simone Kucznir Renzcherchen, Josélia Elvira Teixeira () and Victor Freitas de Azerêdo Barros ()
Additional contact information
Simone Kucznir Renzcherchen: Postgraduate Program in Administration—PPGADM, University of the Central-West—UNICENTRO
Josélia Elvira Teixeira: Department of Economics and Management at PPGADM—University of the Central-West—UNICENTRO
Victor Freitas de Azerêdo Barros: University of Minho, School of Engineering

A chapter in Business Sustainability: Innovation in Entrepreneurship & Internationalisation, 2026, pp 215-228 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter aimed to track the 4.0 agricultural technologies used in soybean production by rural producers of a grain cooperative in Irati-PR. To qualify as Agriculture 4.0, several hyperconnected technologies aiding farmers’ decision-making are necessary. Commonly used technologies include sensors, robots, drones, Big Data, and analytical data management tools. The research methodology involved the application of a Google Forms questionnaire via WhatsApp from October 2023 to February 2024, with data analyzed using statistical analysis. The responses indicate that 80% of farmers have observed an increase in soybean production in the last 5 years, motivating their interest in adopting these technologies. However, adoption costs are high because Agriculture 4.0 requires multiple interconnected technologies accessed through the Internet. Limited Internet connectivity, due to the lack of fiber optics in much of the analyzed region, poses a constraint. Another limiting factor is the lack of operational and maintenance workforce, such as for drones. Despite seeking increased production and intending to invest in new technologies, properties lack the infrastructure to do so, even though 93% of them are small-scale. Nevertheless, technological tools are already being used in soybean production in the region: 6% for satellite crop monitoring; 15% with onboard computers; 13% with autopilot; 14% with machine sensors; 10% with cameras; and 6% with remote control software. Thus, although there is already access to technological tools and interest from producers in the Central South region of Paraná to adopt new technologies, limiting factors hinder the full integration of small farmers into Agriculture 4.0.

Keywords: Agricultural digitalization; Internet connectivity; Family farming; Soybean production; Agricultural infrastructure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-99147-9_13

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031991479

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-99147-9_13

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().