Carbon Trading Policies and Climate Change Mitigation in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review
Sunday Adewale Olaleye (),
Olusegun Peter Olaoye (),
Mulugeta Negash Wodaje () and
Amoo Olagunju Emmanuel ()
Additional contact information
Sunday Adewale Olaleye: Jamk University of Applied Sciences, School of Business
Olusegun Peter Olaoye: Covenant University, Academic Planning Unit and Centre for Economic Policy and Development Research (CEPDeR)
Mulugeta Negash Wodaje: University of Gondar
Amoo Olagunju Emmanuel: Huawei Technologies, Monitoring & Evaluation
A chapter in The Palgrave Handbook of Carbon Trading in Africa, 2026, pp 33-73 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract Carbon trading in Africa is promoted by Africans and international actors as a market-based instrument for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and supporting sustainable development; however, its effectiveness in Africa remains contested. This chapter conducts a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed, English-language studies on carbon trading and climate change in Africa published between 2001 and 2023. The study searched across ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore using multiple keyword combinations, yielding 101 records; after PRISMA-guided screening of inclusion and exclusion, the authors used eleven (11) articles for thematic synthesis and quality appraisal. The evidence base skewed towards a few countries (notably South Africa, Ghana, Central African states, and Senegal) and mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), REDD+ initiatives, and soil and forest carbon-sequestration projects. The reviewed studies show that carbon trading can generate emission reductions, green jobs, and additional farm income, and incentivize improved forest management and low-carbon technologies. However, African participation in carbon markets remains marginal, constrained by weak governance, limited technical capacity, high transaction costs, regulatory uncertainty, and volatile credit prices. The benefits of carbon trading in Africa are not equal, with frequent misalignments between market logic, local development, and justice priorities. There is a mixed methodological quality as major studies are descriptive, lack explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria, and provide limited empirical evaluation of long-term outcomes. The review concludes that while existing architectures have not yet delivered broad-based climate or development gains for Africa, reformed governance, robust Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems, enhanced carbon literacy, and alignment with the SDGs, especially through emerging voluntary markets, could improve performance. Future research should broaden geographic and linguistic coverage and examine the distributional and justice impacts, including gender, indigeneity, and rural livelihoods.
Keywords: Climate change; Carbon trading; Policies; Africa; Systematic Literature Review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-00934-0_3
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032009340
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-00934-0_3
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().