Potemkin’s Villages: The (Weak) Institutional Framework for Rurality and Rural Policy in Slovenia?
Ilona Rac (),
Borut Stojilković () and
Emil Erjavec ()
Additional contact information
Ilona Rac: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty
Borut Stojilković: Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation
Emil Erjavec: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty
Chapter 3 in Innovation and the Future of Rural Development in Europe, 2026, pp 41-69 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract Rural development (RD) is gaining new emphasis in the EU, particularly with the Long-Term Vision for Rural Areas (LTVRA). In Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC), RD policy was introduced with EU accession, with significant funds allocated under the Common Agricultural policy, as well as under broader regional development policy. However, some questions remain: how has the concept of a specific rurality been embraced, and how is it understood and implemented, if at all? The primary aim of this paper is to highlight the specific needs that dictate a specialised approach to rural areas and RD, and, secondly, to propose a framework for more effective integration of RD policies into the national and EU-wide policy landscapes. To achieve this, we employed a mixed-methods approach, including a review of existing policy documents, an analysis of specific case studies within Slovenia, and interviews with key stakeholders in the RD sector. This comprehensive approach allowed us to identify the core areas where current RD policies fall short, and to understand the broader implications of these shortcomings. The results reveal that there is a significant lack of specific, detailed analyses of the real needs within rural areas that would inform more targeted RD policies. Moreover, the current institutional framework and resource allocation practices do not adequately support the effective implementation of RD policies, thereby hindering the achievement of new EU objectives, such as those outlined in the Long-Term Rural Vision (LTRVA). Based on these findings, we propose the establishment of a national rural council, clarification of definitions of rurality, and development of a strategy that would be more aligned with both national and EU visions for rural development. This paper highlights the urgent need for an integrated approach to RD that considers the specific challenges and opportunities faced by rural areas in Slovenia and other EU countries facing similar issues.
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-22570-2_3
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032225702
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-22570-2_3
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().