The Friedman Versus Korten Argument: Are These Dichotomies Still Valid in the Twenty-First Century?

Christopher Anne Robinson-Easley
Additional contact information
Christopher Anne Robinson-Easley: Enlightening Management Consultants, Inc.

Chapter Chapter 5 in Leadership for Global Systemic Change, 2017, pp 87-103 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Many years ago, when I taught my first introduction to business class at my former university, I was appalled to see that the textbook chosen provided such limited coverage on the topic of social responsibility. The primary views on social responsibility presented in this textbook were those of Dr. Milton Friedman—a view I felt to be very limited.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Social Responsibility; Corporate Social Responsibility Activity; Corporate Responsibility; Psychological Contract (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-38949-3_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319389493

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-38949-3_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().