Automatic Balancing Mechanisms in Practice: What Lessons for Pension Policy Makers?

Frederic Gannon (), Florence Legros () and Vincent Touzé
Additional contact information
Frederic Gannon: University of Le Havre
Florence Legros: ICN – Business School

A chapter in Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance, 2018, pp 369-373 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Despite numerous reforms and the introduction of automatic or semi-automatic adjustment mechanisms, pension system future solvency is not guaranteed. Then, setting up an automatic balancing mechanism can offer several advantages. This article proposes to detail the specific properties of various adjustment rules prevailing in different countries to see to what extent their understanding may be helpful to determine public choices ensuring sustainable retirement systems. Several of such adjustment rules are possible. Three rules will get our attention. The American case is radical. The prohibition to resort to public debt, the so-called “fiscal cliff”, forces the balance by a drastic reduction of pensions whenever the reserve fund is exhausted. The underlying idea is that this socially unacceptable perspective will force the parliament to take measures to restore solvency. The Swedish approach relies on an adjustment through the general level of pensions to guarantee a notional asset/liability ratio. A huge reserve fund smooths the shock associated with the aging of the population. The Canadian approach is based on an “inadequate rate provision” which increases the contribution rate and a pension freeze as long as the federal and provincial finance ministers do not reach an agreement.

Keywords: Unfunded pension scheme; Automatic balancing mechanism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Automatic Balancing Mechanisms in Practice: What Lessons for Pension Policy Makers? (2018)
Working Paper: Automatic Balancing Mechanisms in Practice: What Lessons for Pension Policy Makers? (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-89824-7_66

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319898247

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-89824-7_66

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().