Reporting Effect Sizes: The New Star System

Bruno Lecoutre and Jacques Poitevineau
Additional contact information
Bruno Lecoutre: Universite de Rouen, CNRS
Jacques Poitevineau: Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS

Chapter Chapter 6 in The Significance Test Controversy Revisited, 2022, pp 55-65 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The shortcomings of the widespread practice of simply reporting effect size [ES] indicators in addition to NSHT (without interval estimates) are demonstrated. The consequences of restricting the use of ES to standardized measures, as is common in psychology and related fields, are being questioned.

Keywords: Effect size indicators; Phi coefficient; Sample and population effect sizes; Shortcomings of standardized effect sizes; Simple effect sizes; The new star system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-65705-8_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783662657058

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-65705-8_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().