An Analysis of Ingredient Branding Using the Example of Tetra Pak

Peter Schnedlitz () and Stefan Zopf
Additional contact information
Peter Schnedlitz: WU Vienna University of Business and Economics
Stefan Zopf: WU Vienna University of Business and Economics

A chapter in European Retail Research, 2009, pp 127-143 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Using Tetra Pak as an example of an ingredient brand, this article will examine whether an ingredient brand can be proved to have an added value affecting the market strength of the final product. In order to determine this, an empirical method of investigation combining compositional and decompositional methods was developed. Determining the value through compositional means was carried out by selecting market strength parameters while the decompositional aspect was carried out in conjunction with conjoint analyses. With more than 800 samples the project is the most comprehensive study applying conjoint analysis in the German-speaking world to date. It is thus proven that a strong ingredient brand does not always contribute significant added value to an end-product brand. Particular thanks must go to Tetra Pak, who enabled us to carry out this project.

Keywords: Ingredient Branding; Retailing; Tetra Pak (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-8349-6344-4_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783834963444

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8349-6344-4_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().