Misunderstanding Classical Economics? A Reply to Blaug

Pierangelo Garegnani

A chapter in Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand, 2024, pp 341-352 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract From Professor Blaug History of Political Economy 31:213–236, 1999 article (unspecified page references are to it) there emerges the paradox that an interpretation pointing to the basic role of institutional and historical factors in the classical theory of distribution and capital accumulation is criticized as “amazingly narrow” (215), one that looks at those economists “‘through the lenses of the linear production model’” (234).

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Misunderstanding Classical Economics? A Reply to Blaug (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:spshcp:978-3-031-23643-3_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031236433

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23643-3_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().