Evaluating Projections
Stanley K. Smith,
Jeff Tayman and
David A. Swanson
Additional contact information
Stanley K. Smith: University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research
Jeff Tayman: University of California-San Diego, Economics Department
David A. Swanson: University of California Riverside, Department of Sociology
Chapter Chapter 12 in A Practitioner's Guide to State and Local Population Projections, 2013, pp 301-322 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract How does one go about choosing the specific models, techniques, assumptions, and data sources to use when constructing a set of population projections? Is there a single “best” approach, or at least some that are better than others? In this chapter, we describe a number of criteria that can be used to evaluate population projections: provision of necessary detail, face validity, plausibility, costs of production, timeliness, ease of application and explanation, usefulness as an analytical tool, political acceptability, and forecast accuracy. We discuss the trade-offs that must be made when choosing projection methods and close with an assessment of how different methods stack up according to these evaluation criteria.
Keywords: Projection Method; Data User; Face Validity; Forecast Accuracy; Extrapolation Method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-94-007-7551-0_12
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789400775510
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7551-0_12
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().