EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power?

Thomas König () and Dirk Junge ()
Additional contact information
Thomas König: Mannheim University
Dirk Junge: Mannheim University

Chapter Chapter 8 in Reform Processes and Policy Change, 2011, pp 165-186 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Why do the member states with veto power usually support a policy change proposed by a Commission initiative when their own position is located closer to the status quo? Why do we frequently witness consensus in the Council and rarely observe a rejection of Commission initiatives even after additional veto players, such as new member states or the European Parliament, have increased the constraints on policy change by legislative decision making in the European Union (EU)? To answer these questions, this study investigates the voting preferences and logrolling opportunities of the member states on 48 Commission proposals. We find that models that derive the voting preferences from each Commission initiative are scarcely able to explain the consensus in the Council. One reason is that the Commission attempts to avoid a divided Council by initiating proposals for which member states favour a policy change in the same direction. When member states still dispute the size of policy change, we show that they can find a solution by mutually benefiting from logrolling across proposals that either belong to the same policy domain or are negotiated during the same period. Hence, inter-temporal and domain-specific logrolling can provide a powerful explanation for consensus even in a contested Council.

Keywords: European Union; Member State; Vote Behaviour; Veto Player; European Parliament (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4419-5809-9_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781441958099

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5809-9_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Studies in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4419-5809-9_8