Nominating Candidates Under New Rules in Italy and Japan: You Cannot Bargain with Resources You Do Not Have
Aldo Virgilio () and
Steven R. Reed ()
Additional contact information
Aldo Virgilio: University of Bologna
Steven R. Reed: Chuo University
Chapter Chapter 4 in A Natural Experiment on Electoral Law Reform, 2011, pp 61-75 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract In the 1990s, Italy and Japan both adopted mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) electoral systems that combined single member districts (SMDs) with proportional representation (PR) (Shugart and Wattenberg 2001b). Political parties in both countries were thus faced with the novel problem of deciding who to nominate in each SMD. In both countries, SMD nominations were made through complex negotiations among candidates, parties, and coalitions, but the form taken by those negotiations were quite different. In Italy, nominations were allocated through a centralized bargaining process among the parties participating in a pre-electoral coalition (PEC). PECs allocated winnable SMDs to the participating parties in proportion to the overall contribution of the party to the national vote of the coalition. Italian parties thus “proportionalized the SMDs” (D’Alimonte 2005). In Japan, nominations were determined by decentralized negotiations at the district level between candidates and the central party headquarters. In Italy, there was a single national bargaining table for each electoral coalition, while in Japan there were 300 different bargaining tables for each party, one for each SMD. Why did the response to such similar problems differ so widely?
Keywords: Electoral System; Proportional Representation; Liberal Democratic Party; Nomination Process; Coalition Partner (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4419-7228-6_4
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781441972286
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7228-6_4
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Studies in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().