The Bioeconomics of Scout Bees Voting-with-the-Wings Using Less-Than-Unanimity Voting Rule: Can Bees Count, Quorum Sense, etc.?

Janet T. Landa ()
Additional contact information
Janet T. Landa: York University

Chapter Chapter 7 in Public Choice, Past and Present, 2013, pp 89-99 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Recent experimental findings by Thomas Seeley et al. (2006) found that the essence of group decision-making by scout bees is their use of a kind of “quorum-sensing” voting rule, rather than the unanimity rule (Martin Lindauer 1961) in arriving at their collective choice of the best new nest site. In light of the new experimental findings, this paper revises my earlier paper’s (Landa 1986) theoretical conclusion that the unanimity rule is the “best” rule for the scout bees’ collective choice of the best new nest site. A novelty in this paper is my hypothesis that bees, though unable to count, are able to “subitize” and hence able to sense when a collective decision by a quorum of scout bees has been reached.

Keywords: Public Choice; Nest Site; Quorum Sensing; Vote Rule; Collective Decision (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4614-5909-5_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781461459095

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5909-5_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Studies in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().