Iterative Refinement of Multi-Method OR Workshop Designs through Boundary Critique: An Analytical Framework and Case Studies in Technology Utilisation

Ksenia Ivanova () and Sondoss Elsawah ()
Additional contact information
Ksenia Ivanova: Defence Science & Technology Group
Sondoss Elsawah: University of New South Wales Canberra

Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2022, vol. 35, issue 3, No 3, 345-374

Abstract: Abstract Operations research (OR) is frequently depicted in terms of a ‘toolbox’ of pre-determined methods and techniques that should be matched to the given problem context. In practice, OR practitioners often tailor, combine and modify elements of methodologies, methods and techniques, particularly within multi-method interventions. Transparent tracking of this process of methodological evolution can generate more effective OR intervention designs and facilitate reflection on the underlying theoretical assumptions. In our study of concept development for logistic and health support operations, we apply the principles of iterative refinement to workshop designs through the use of boundary critique as the basis for analysis. In demonstrating a real-life application of such iterative refinement, we outline the evolution of a multi-method intervention design through theory–practice cycles across five creative workshops. The focus of the workshops is generation of new ideas for technology utilisation and development of comprehensive capability concepts based on these ideas. Our study results point to positive effects from reducing system boundaries associated with conventional ways of thinking, and with the introduction of boundary-expanding steps, such as individual and creative thinking techniques. We also report more successful outcomes when formulating the problem in terms of capabilities or applications, rather than in terms of specific technologies. Further application of the proposed analytical framework may open the door for creative OR workshop design across different domains through understanding and shaping of system boundaries.

Keywords: Boundary critique; Workshop design; Multi-method; Critical systems practice; Emerging technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-021-09576-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:syspar:v:35:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11213-021-09576-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11213

DOI: 10.1007/s11213-021-09576-7

Access Statistics for this article

Systemic Practice and Action Research is currently edited by Robert Flood

More articles in Systemic Practice and Action Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().