Assessment of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Sugar Beet Canopy Cover, Biomass and Root Yield under Different Irrigation and Field Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of Pakistan

Abdul Malik, Abdul Sattar Shakir, Muhammad Ajmal (), Muhammad Jamal Khan and Taj Ali Khan
Additional contact information
Abdul Malik: University of Engineering & Technology
Abdul Sattar Shakir: University of Engineering & Technology
Muhammad Ajmal: University of Engineering & Technology
Muhammad Jamal Khan: Agricultural University Peshawar
Taj Ali Khan: University of Engineering & Technology

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2017, vol. 31, issue 13, No 15, 4275-4292

Abstract: Abstract The AquaCrop model was analyzed for simulating sugar beet crop production under four irrigation regimes, three mulching conditions and three furrow irrigation systems in semi-arid region of Pakistan. Irrigation regimes were full irrigation (FI), 20% deficit irrigation (DI20), 40% deficit irrigation (DI40) and 60% deficit irrigation (DI60). The mulching practices were No-mulch (NM), black film mulch (BFM) and straw mulch (SM). The furrow irrigation systems were conventional ridge-furrow (CRF) system, medium raised-bed (MRB) system and wide raised-bed (WRB) system. The model was calibrated and validated using the independent data sets of full irrigation and deficit irrigation regimes collected during 2011–12 cropping season. The model performance was evaluated by using different statistical indicators such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), index of agreement (dindex), and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). These indicators showed that the model fairly simulated sugar beet canopy cover for all treatments with 3.00 ≤ RMSE ≤ 16.89, 0.84 ≤ dindex ≤ 0.97, and 0.76 ≤ NSE ≤ 0.99. For biomass and root yield, the model performance was excellent under all full irrigation (FI) and mild deficit irrigation (DI20) treatments with RMSE ranged between 0.07 and 1.17, dindex between 0.48 and 0.84, and NSE between 0.42 and 0.86, respectively. However the low values of dindex (0.10 and 0.13) and NSE (−69.32 and −30.63) showed that the model overestimated both the biomass and root yield when 20% deficit irrigation was applied without mulch in WRB system. The model also over estimated the yield and biomass when 40% deficit irrigation was applied in CRF system. The highest overestimation (dindex: 0.10 to 0.11; NSE: −50.92 to −70.55) was observed when highest stress level (DI60) was applied in the presence of BFM in CRF system. Based on the model’s overall performance, the AquaCrop application is recommended for developing efficient farm water management strategies in the semi-arid regions.

Keywords: AquaCrop; Deficit irrigation; Mulches; Water management strategies; Canopy cover; Biomass; Root yield; Sugar beet (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-017-1745-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:13:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1745-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1745-z

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().