Notion and Meaning of Evidence Verification in Criminal Procedure

Roman Kostenko () and Artem Rudin ()
Additional contact information
Roman Kostenko: Kuban State University Krasnodar Russian Federation, Postal: RU
Artem Rudin: Krasnodar University of the Interior Ministry Krasnodar Russian Federation, Postal: RU

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2018, vol. 9, issue 3(33), 1011-1017

Abstract: This article deals with the main topical issues of the notion and meaning of evidence verification in criminal procedure Notwithstanding many scientific studies of various years there are still many outstanding issues and conflicting opinions concerning the purposes methods subjects and procedural order of evidence verification In law the regulation of some procedural aspects related to verification is obviously insufficient After all this situation negatively influences the quality of preliminary investigation and a judicial decision passed Meanwhile the development of a unified scientific approach and clear legal regulation could facilitate the solution of important practical aspects namely the proof of fault and the quality of punishment imposed In view of the foregoing the authors of this article aim at analyzing all available information about evidence verification as an element of preliminary investigation to develop theoretical provisions that provide answers to outstanding issues as well as to improve regulations of Russian criminal procedure This analysis comprises opinions of criminal procedure researchers including foreign ones and regulations of Russian criminal procedure law The evidence verification and its purposes are considered by the authors in the context of the proper understanding of the very process of evidence in criminal cases The authors represent the structural elements of the evidence process in close interrelation Basing on the analysis of certain provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation the authors conclude that the evidence verification is aimed at clarifying their reliability relevance and admissibility The attitude of this article s authors may become a matter of scholarly discussion in future and theoretical provisions developed by the authors may be used in learning aids and practical manuals for those who carry out preliminary investigation and proposals for improving rules of procedure may be considered for supplementing procedural law

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:3(33):p:1011-1017

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics is currently edited by Madalina Constantinescu

More articles in Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics from ASERS Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Popirlan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).