Understanding R&D performance: A note on a new OECD indicator

Tore Sandven
Additional contact information
Tore Sandven: The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy, http://www.step.no/

No 199416, STEP Report series from The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy

Abstract: This paper deals with various technical issues relating to the use of R&D statistics. But these technical issues are of considerable importance in understanding R&D performance, and therefore in identifying policy problems and policy objectives. The basic problem follows from the use of 'R&D intensity' - meaning the R&D/Value Added or R&D/Sales ratio - as an overall indicator for the manufacturing sector of the economy, or for the economy as a whole. This particular measure has become extremely popular as an overall performance indicator, and is frequently used by policymakers, especially for international comparisons. However the indicator has a serious weakness, which is that it reflects not just R&D performance, but also the industrial structure in which R&D is carried out. So the indictor cannot be used - as it frequently is - simply as a measure of relative R&D strength.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.step.no/reports/Y1994/1694.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:stp:stepre:1994r16

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nifu.no/

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in STEP Report series from The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy Hammersborg torg 3, 0179 Oslo, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nils Henrik Solum ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).