Publication trends and the network of publishing institutions in accounting: data on, 1926–2014

Christian Lohmann and Marc Eulerich

Accounting History Review, 2017, vol. 27, issue 1, 1-25

Abstract: Our study charts the development of the accounting community by tracing publication trends and changes in methodology, including a major shift towards positive and neoclassical economics, multi-authorship and the prevalence of particular institutions, as reflected in The Accounting Review (TAR) between 1926 and 2014. Using network analysis, we identify distinct networks in this community and show that while the network of the institutions to which TAR authors were affiliated in the analysed period became diverse, the network of the institutions from which TAR authors received their doctorate remained dominated by a relatively small group of élite US universities.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2016.1192049 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:27:y:2017:i:1:p:1-25

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rabf21

DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2016.1192049

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting History Review is currently edited by Stephen Walker

More articles in Accounting History Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().