Are commodity prices mean reverting?

Henrik Andersson

Applied Financial Economics, 2007, vol. 17, issue 10, 769-783

Abstract: Are commodity prices mean reverting or do they follow a random walk? As traditional unit root tests lack power, this article proposes using the ability to hedge option contracts as a measure of the most appropriate stochastic process. A misspecified price process will, quite naturally, result in larger hedging errors. The hedging errors, therefore, give an economic as opposed to statistical measure of mean reversion. Market prices of almost 300 different commodities from 1970 and onwards are studied. In line with the low power of statistical unit root tests, we are only able to reject a unit root for some 15% of the commodity price series and mean reversion is accepted for even fewer series. Hedging errors are, however, smaller for the mean reverting process, supporting the intuition that commodity prices are mean reverting.

Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09603100600749204 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:17:y:2007:i:10:p:769-783

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20

DOI: 10.1080/09603100600749204

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Financial Economics is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Financial Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().