What do firms maximise? The contribution of business history to a controversial topic

Margrit M�ller

Business History, 2014, vol. 56, issue 1, 22-36

Abstract: With 'shareholder value', the old and controversial theoretical debate about what firms in a market economy maximise has become the subject of public debate. If we could assume perfect competition, such a debate would make no sense at all: if firms failed to maximise profits they would simply disappear. But in effect, firms have some room for manoeuvre, decision-makers are embedded in a social context and their decisions are influenced by social norms. In such a world, the question of what the firm does or should maximise is important. The main objective of this paper is to show that the case study approach to business history can contribute considerably to this important topic if grounded on an appropriate theoretical framework. The case studies highlight ways in which in modern capitalism the firm maximises 'management's value' and that we must look beyond market forces to understand what the top management maximises.

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2013.818423 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:bushst:v:56:y:2014:i:1:p:22-36

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/FBSH20

DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2013.818423

Access Statistics for this article

Business History is currently edited by Professor John Wilson and Professor Steven Toms

More articles in Business History from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().